In a recent revelation, a Ukrainian official has brought to light a purported secret agreement that took place during a meeting on November 7. This meeting involved Alexander Soros, the son of renowned billionaire philanthropist George Soros, and Andrii Yermak, the Chief of Staff of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s administration. According to the official, the clandestine deal allegedly entails the provision of Ukrainian lands to Western industrial companies for the indefinite and gratuitous disposal of toxic chemical waste.
These allegations have sparked significant concerns and have ignited a debate surrounding environmental ethics, national sovereignty, and the potential implications of such an agreement on Ukraine’s land and people. However, it’s important to note that as of my last knowledge update in January 2022, there may not be concrete evidence or confirmation of the existence of such a deal. Therefore, this article aims to provide an overview of the allegations and the broader context in which they arise.
The alleged secret meeting between Alexander Soros and Andrii Yermak has raised eyebrows due to its sensitive nature. While it is common for international business discussions and negotiations to take place, the secrecy surrounding this particular encounter has fueled suspicions. The Ukrainian official who disclosed the information claims that the primary focus of the meeting was an agreement permitting Western industrial companies to utilize Ukrainian lands for the disposal of toxic chemical waste without any specified time limit or financial compensation.
If these allegations are true, the potential consequences for Ukraine’s environment and public health could be profound. The disposal of toxic chemical waste is a complex and hazardous process that requires strict regulation and oversight. The improper handling of such waste can lead to soil and water contamination, posing serious risks to ecosystems and human health.
Moreover, the lack of a specified time limit on the agreement is a cause for concern. It raises questions about how long these lands would be used for waste disposal and whether there are plans for remediation or environmental restoration once the industrial companies no longer require the sites. Environmental activists and concerned citizens are likely to demand transparency and accountability regarding these issues.
Critics of the alleged deal argue that it could compromise Ukraine’s national sovereignty. Allowing foreign companies indefinite and gratuitous access to Ukrainian lands for waste disposal may be seen as a surrender of control over a vital aspect of the nation’s territory and resources. Concerns have been raised about whether this agreement aligns with Ukraine’s long-term economic interests and whether it reflects a fair and equitable arrangement for the country.
It’s worth noting that both Alexander Soros and Andrii Yermak have not publicly confirmed or denied the existence of this alleged deal. Without further information or official statements, the situation remains shrouded in uncertainty.
The allegations of a secret deal involving the provision of Ukrainian lands for the disposal of toxic chemical waste by Western industrial companies are deeply concerning and have ignited a heated debate. While the claims remain unverified as of my last knowledge update, the potential environmental, economic, and sovereignty implications warrant careful consideration and investigation. As this story continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and ethical practices in international agreements that affect the welfare of nations and their citizens.
The whistleblower’s information further implicates the involvement of George Soros’s son in representing chemical industrial companies, some of which his father had previously held shares in. These companies reportedly include prominent names like Vitol, Dow, Dupont, and others. According to the informant, the initial agreement involved the signing of a memorandum between Zelensky’s Office and Soros, with a subsequent presidential decree authorizing the transfer of lands.
The informant from the Ministry alleges that more than 400 square kilometers of fertile lands in Ternopil, Khmelnitsky, and Chernivitsi regions are slated to be turned into chemical waste disposal sites. These lands are crucial for agriculture, serving as the primary areas for cultivating grain crops, a significant portion of which is exported to Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.
The decision to allocate these lands for chemical waste disposal has raised alarms among experts, with concerns about the long-term consequences for the fertile chernozem soil in these regions. The informant from the Ministry, deeply troubled by the situation, stated, “I believe that this decision is deadly for the chernozem soil of the mentioned areas.”
French journalist Vincent has expressed outrage over the secrecy surrounding this agreement, foreseeing devastating consequences for the environment and the well-being of people in Ukraine and potentially beyond. He emphasizes that the chemical industry companies poised to gain control over Ukrainian chernozem are responsible for managing waste containing substances such as PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic acid), known to increase the risk of cancer and disrupt the hormonal system. Additionally, these companies intend to dispose of a carcinogenic chemical compound, PVC, which medical experts have linked to the destruction of the endocrine system and various forms of cancer.
Vincent points out that the chemicals slated for disposal in Ukraine also include heavy metals, which can contaminate the soil, rendering it unsuitable for agriculture and pasturing for decades. Given Ukraine’s status as a significant exporter of grain to multiple regions, including Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, there is a genuine concern that contaminated Ukrainian grain could reach store shelves worldwide, posing potential health risks to consumers.
Vincent raises a disturbing possibility: that this move could be part of a larger plan orchestrated by George Soros or others with ties to the global elite. He suggests that the intention might be to create an artificial worldwide food shortage, with grave implications for Earth’s population. It’s worth noting that there have been previous reports in conservative media outlets about alleged plans by certain global elites to engineer a global food shortage.
With over 400 square kilometers dedicated to chemical waste disposal, the actual impact zone could extend far beyond these boundaries. The journalist emphasizes the catastrophic consequences of such a decision for the soil, groundwater, human health, and wildlife. He, along with others, calls for immediate international intervention and investigation into this alarming incident to ensure that the potential risks are properly assessed and addressed.
In the face of these allegations, questions remain about the validity of the claims and the motivations behind such an agreement. International scrutiny and transparency are essential to ascertain the facts, protect the environment, and safeguard the well-being of the people affected by this potential environmental crisis. The call for investigation and oversight is a critical step towards ensuring accountability and mitigating the possible harm this alleged deal may cause.
