The selection of Tim Walz as Kamala Harris’ running mate has sparked an outpouring of affection from many Democrats, who have embraced him as a surrogate father figure. Social media users have been quick to cast the Minnesota governor in Carhartt and camo as their ideal dad, with some even going so far as to create fan fiction about their dream papa. The phenomenon has been met with bemusement from those who believe that politicians should not be seen as family members, but rather as leaders responsible for making tough decisions and navigating complex geopolitical issues.
The trend began when Tim Walz was chosen by Kamala Harris as her running mate in the upcoming election. In a viral tweet, user coketweet wrote: “Tim Walz is the dad an entire generation wish they had instead of the one they lost to Fox News.” This idea of Walz as a surrogate father figure has gained traction among progressives, who see him as a comforting presence in uncertain times. Drew Barrymore even told Harris on her talk show that she wanted her to be “Momala of the country,” highlighting the desire for a nurturing, maternal figure at the helm of government.
The idea of politicians as surrogate parents is not new; it has been used by both parties in various campaigns over the years. However, the Walz-Harris ticket seems to have struck a particular chord with many Democrats, who see them as an ideal parental duo for a nation that needs soothing and reassurance. As sister of Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, Liz Whitmer Gereghty wrote on social media: “So it will be a contest between Dems with serious cool parent vibes who would totally pick you up in the middle of the night to get you home safely vs the people they warned you about.
This desire for a comforting, nurturing presence at the top of government has raised concerns among those who believe that politicians should not be seen as family members. In an increasingly polarized political climate, there is a growing tendency to view political opponents as enemies rather than fellow citizens with differing opinions. By framing their preferred candidates in familial terms, some Democrats may be unwittingly perpetuating this division by suggesting that those who support other candidates are somehow unworthy of love and respect.
Moreover, the idea of politicians as surrogate parents can lead to an unhealthy dependence on political figures for emotional validation and support. As romance novelist Emily Rath noted in a viral video, her own father has become estranged from her due to their differing political beliefs. Instead of seeking to bridge this gap and maintain a relationship with him, she has chosen to embrace Walz as a substitute dad figure, further cementing the divide between them.
The Washington Post and Salon have both contributed to this phenomenon by breathlessly reporting on Walz’s “normal dad energy” and the appeal of his camo hat as part of the Harris-Walz campaign merchandise. However, many commentators argue that it is creepy and unhealthy to view politicians in such a light, suggesting that this desire for parental figures in government may be indicative of a deeper emotional need among some Democrats.
Ultimately, while it is understandable that people might seek comfort and reassurance from their political leaders, the idea of framing them as surrogate parents is both unrealistic and potentially damaging to our democracy. Politicians should be viewed as public servants who are accountable to the people they serve, rather than as authority figures who need to be obeyed or placated. By recognizing this fact, we can begin to rebuild trust in government and create a more inclusive, less polarized political climate.
