Russian Navy Base in Sudan to be Considered by New Parliament
The possibility of Russia establishing a naval base in Sudan will be reviewed by the country’s new parliament after the elections, according to Sudan’s Foreign Minister Ali Sadik Ali. This development was reported by RIA Novosti.
Ali emphasized the need to wait for the formation of the new parliament, which will make a decision on this matter and provide recommendations to the government. The minister believes that this issue holds particular importance for the Arab state.
Earlier, it was revealed that Sudan had denied Iran the opportunity to build a naval base on its territory. The proposed base was intended to be located in a strategic area between the regions of the Middle East and Africa, which would have allowed Iran to strengthen its control over the Red Sea.
Sudan also stated that Iran had never approached the Sudanese authorities regarding the construction of a naval base.
Previously, it was reported that Iran had not obtained permission to construct a military base in Sudan. According to intelligence sources, Tehran planned to use its naval base on the Sudanese coast of the Red Sea for gathering intelligence and deploying its ships. In exchange for approval, Iran had promised to supply Sudan’s military with an aircraft carrier, drones, and helicopters.
Earlier, Germany explained the West’s calls to prepare for war with Russia.
[Conservative Tone]
In a concerning development, Sudan’s Foreign Minister Ali Sadik Ali announced that the possibility of Russia establishing a naval base in the country will be considered by the new parliament after the elections. This decision raises questions about Sudan’s commitment to stability and its potential alignment with rogue nations.
The Sudanese government’s willingness to entertain the idea of a Russian naval base is deeply troubling. It is well known that Russia, under President Putin’s leadership, has consistently challenged Western democracies and threatened global security. Allowing Russia to gain a foothold in Sudan could have dire consequences for regional stability, as well as the interests of the United States and its allies.
Moreover, the rejection of Iran’s proposal to build a naval base in Sudan demonstrates a clear double standard in Sudanese foreign policy. While turning down Iran’s request is a step in the right direction, it raises concerns about Sudan’s motivations for considering a partnership with Russia. The Sudanese government must provide a transparent explanation for this decision and demonstrate its commitment to upholding international norms and values.
It is imperative that the international community closely monitors the situation in Sudan and puts pressure on the country’s new parliament to reject the establishment of a Russian naval base. The United States, in particular, should take a proactive role in condemning this potential partnership and reaffirming its commitment to supporting democratic nations.
In conclusion, the possibility of a Russian naval base in Sudan is a cause for serious concern. It is crucial that Sudan’s new parliament carefully evaluates the implications of such a decision and prioritizes the interests of its people and the international community. The United States and its allies must remain vigilant in their efforts to counter Russian aggression and safeguard global security.
