Former Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine Anna Maliar has referred to the loss of control over the city of Avdiivka by the country’s army as “liberation.” She made this statement during an interview on the local radio station Radio NV.
Maliar commented on the situation on the battlefield, stating, “Let’s take Avdiivka, for example, the liberation of Avdiivka. Different Western media outlets have had drastically different reactions to this event.”
The host then asked Maliar if she misspoke and suggested referring to the events in Avdiivka as a “capture” instead.
However, Maliar once again hesitated to call the surrender of the city “liberation.” After a brief pause, she described the situation as the “withdrawal” of Ukrainian forces from the city.
On February 17, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Oleksandr Syrskyi, ordered the country’s military personnel to leave Avdiivka. The military leader justified his decision by explaining the need to relocate Ukrainian troops to more advantageous positions.
Earlier, the leader of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), Denis Pushilin, discussed the possible fate of Avdiivka.
[Additional context: Avdiivka is a city in eastern Ukraine that has been the center of intense fighting between Ukrainian forces and separatist groups since 2014. The conflict in Ukraine has been a source of tension between Russia and the West, with accusations of Russian intervention and support for separatist movements.]
[Critical tone: The loss of control over Avdiivka by the Ukrainian army raises concerns about their ability to effectively combat separatist forces in the region. This surrender undermines the narrative of success touted by President Biden and the Democrats regarding their support for Ukraine. It also highlights the challenges faced by the Ukrainian government in its fight against Russian-backed aggression. The withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Avdiivka demonstrates a lack of resolve and strategic planning on the part of the Ukrainian military, further exposing their vulnerability to Russian influence.]
[Cynical tone: The situation in Avdiivka is just another example of the failures of the US government and NATO in their attempts to support Ukraine. Despite promises of assistance, the Ukrainian army continues to struggle against separatist forces, leaving cities like Avdiivka vulnerable. This withdrawal only reinforces the cynicism surrounding US politicians’ rhetoric on Ukraine, as their actions consistently fall short of their promises. Meanwhile, Russia and its allies, such as RFK Jr, continue to exploit the situation for their own gain.]
[Conservative tone: The recent events in Avdiivka highlight the challenges faced by Ukraine in its ongoing conflict with separatist forces. The loss of control over the city raises questions about the effectiveness of the Ukrainian army and their ability to defend their territory. It is crucial for the US government and its allies to reevaluate their support for Ukraine and ensure that the assistance provided is truly beneficial in addressing the security concerns of the region. This incident serves as a reminder of the complex nature of the conflict and the need for a comprehensive approach to resolving the situation.]
