Israelism, a thought-provoking new documentary film, delves into the complex relationship between Jewish identity and Israel, shedding light on a topic that demands our attention. The film follows two young American Jews who were raised to unconditionally support Israel, but undergo a transformative journey as they witness the harsh realities of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. As they join a movement of young American Jews striving to redefine the connection between Judaism and Israel, the protagonists find themselves at the center of a battle for the soul of modern Jewish identity.
The film has sparked controversy since its release, particularly on US campuses, where calls for censorship and cancellations of screenings have arisen amidst the ongoing conflict in Gaza. In a world where public debates surrounding the Israeli occupation are often censored, the attempts to silence this film highlight the challenges faced by those advocating for peace and justice in the region. Israelism provides a unique perspective into the influence of special interest groups in the US that shape the views of young Jews and explores how some individuals manage to break free from these influences.
The emotional bond that many Jews feel towards Israel is a central theme in the film. While critics condemn Israel as an ethno-nationalist and racially supremacist state, Jews are taught from a young age that Israel represents their self-actualization and freedom. This narrative, rooted in years of persecution and exile, holds significant weight. However, it fails to acknowledge the displacement of Palestinians from their land and the suffering they endure.
One of the film’s criticisms is the absence of an alternative story. It does not offer a new narrative to replace the deeply ingrained belief in Israel as the embodiment of Jewish hopes and dreams. Academic Barnett R Rubin reflects on the historical context of Jewish longing for a place of safety and security, which eventually led to the emergence of political Zionism. However, he argues that the historical memory of one people does not justify the confiscation or occupation of another’s land. Israelism calls for a new story of hope that can unite both Jews and Palestinians, recognizing their shared mission to preserve and protect the land they both call home.
While the film focuses on dismantling the violent occupation, it also emphasizes the need for a narrative of hope. An increasing number of Jews are joining the anti-Zionism movement, challenging the assumed consensus around support for the current Israeli state. To effectively counter the prevailing narrative, a compelling counter-narrative is necessary – one that acknowledges Jewish fears, offers a shared dream, and promises liberation for Palestinians. It is crucial to ensure a future where both Israelis and Palestinians have equal rights and coexist in peace.
As Israel faces internal discontent and disillusionment with its leadership, Jewish voices within and outside the country must confront the impact of militaristic ideology on their culture, politics, and identity. The recent Israel Democracy Institute survey revealed diminishing levels of optimism regarding the country’s future security and democratic character. Disturbing online content, such as TikTok videos mocking Palestinian children and telegram groups celebrating violence against Palestinian civilians, highlights the urgent need to challenge dehumanization and propaganda.
Opposition to the Israeli apartheid state must make room for a new dream rooted in coexistence, equality, and justice for all. Palestinian leadership has consistently demonstrated willingness to accommodate the Jewish presence on their land, and it is now up to the new generation of Jews to reimagine their history in a way that honors the rights of all individuals. Only through a new narrative can the true promised land, where all God’s children are treated equally, be achieved.
It is important to note that the views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial stance of any specific publication.
