In a surprising turn of events, Republican South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace is facing a primary challenge from her former chief of staff, Dan Hanlon. Hanlon, who served in the Trump administration’s Office of Management and Budget before joining Mace’s office, filed his statement of candidacy with the Federal Election Commission on Friday. This move comes following Hanlon’s departure from Mace’s office last month under reportedly contentious circumstances.
The primary election in South Carolina is scheduled to take place on June 11, and Hanlon’s decision to challenge Mace has garnered attention from both supporters and critics. According to sources, a handful of former Mace staffers have been informally aiding Hanlon’s bid to replace his ex-boss.
Mace and Hanlon reportedly had a falling-out last fall when Mace voted with seven Republicans and all Democrats to oust then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy from his post. This decision seemed to have strained their relationship, leading to Hanlon’s decision to challenge Mace in the upcoming primary.
While Hanlon has not officially announced his candidacy, an advisor to him stated that Mace has become a joke in the Lowcountry, and South Carolinians are looking for an alternative they can be proud of. The advisor also criticized Mace’s financial gains during her time in office, claiming that she has not delivered any significant results.
Mace’s campaign has responded to Hanlon’s potential challenge, expressing disbelief and suggesting that he would need to move to the district if he were to run. Mace’s spokesperson also made accusations about Hanlon’s residency, stating that he doesn’t live in the district.
In response to these accusations, a source familiar with Hanlon’s plans stated that he owns a home in the district, while Mace had her ex-fiancé buy her one. The back-and-forth between the two camps adds an interesting dynamic to the upcoming primary race.
As the primary election approaches, all eyes will be on the race between Mace and Hanlon. The outcome could have significant implications for the Republican Party in South Carolina and may signal a shift in political dynamics within the state.
