House Democratic leaders are pushing back against Republicans’ efforts to prohibit federal electric vehicle (EV) mandates and reverse recent environmental regulations targeting gas-powered cars. The so-called Choice in Automobile Retail Sales (CARS) Act, which aims to block regulations proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has sparked a heated debate between Democrats and Republicans.
In an internal memo obtained by Digital, Democrats argue that the CARS Act would undermine the EPA’s ability to protect Americans from “dangerous air pollution” that is responsible for thousands of premature deaths every year. They emphasize that over 100 million Americans live in counties with unhealthy air pollution, with vulnerable communities disproportionately affected. Democrats accuse Republicans of using scare tactics to mislead the public about EVs and protecting the interests of Big Oil corporations.
The memo, circulated by Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, is led by Ranking Member Frank Pallone, D-N.J., who is a strong advocate for green energy transition. The CARS Act, introduced by Reps. Tim Walberg, R-Mich., and Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., seeks to block the EPA’s proposed regulations that would raise tailpipe emissions standards for gas-powered cars. It also aims to prohibit any rule mandating the use of specific technology or limiting the availability of new vehicles based on engine type.
One of the key points of contention is whether the EPA’s actions amount to an “EV mandate.” Democrats argue that automakers are already announcing their own EV manufacturing goals independent of federal regulations. However, the White House projects that if the EPA rule is finalized, a significant percentage of new vehicles purchased by 2032 could be electric, potentially accelerating the transition to EVs. President Biden has set a goal of ensuring 50% of car purchases are electric by 2030.
Opponents of the EPA’s actions claim that the new standards would harm consumers by raising costs and limiting vehicle choices. They also raise concerns about the dominance of Chinese industry in global EV battery supply chains. Supporters of the CARS Act argue that it preserves consumer choice and prevents undue manipulation of vehicle emission standards to force electrification.
The CARS Act is set for a floor vote in the House on Wednesday, with bipartisan support in the Senate. President Biden has stated that he would veto the bill if passed. The outcome of this legislative battle will have significant implications for the future of EV mandates and the transition to clean energy in the United States.
In conclusion, the debate over the proposed CARS Act highlights the deep divide between Democrats and Republicans on the issue of EV mandates and environmental regulations. While Democrats argue for the importance of protecting public health and accelerating the transition to clean energy, Republicans raise concerns about consumer choice, costs, and national security implications. The outcome of this legislative battle will shape the future of the automotive industry and the fight against climate change in the United States.
