Amidst the deepening conflict between Israel and Palestine, Western leaders have rushed to the Middle East, while China has taken a more low-key approach. Despite increased diplomatic engagement in the region, China has not emerged as a leading mediator in the current Hamas-Israel war. While Western nations have condemned Hamas’s attack on Israel and deployed troops to deter further escalation, China has called for a ceasefire and emphasized the need for justice for the Palestinian people.
China’s cautious stance is consistent with its traditional prioritization of relations with the Palestinians. Since the era of Mao Zedong, China has viewed the Palestinian struggle for land as part of the world’s national liberation movement. China established diplomatic relations with Israel in 1992 and has since invested billions in its economy, but its investments in the Palestinian territories are minimal compared to its economic ties with Israel and Saudi Arabia.
China’s deep economic ties with the Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia, have shaped its Middle East outlook. As the Israeli military operations in Gaza triggered strong outcry from these countries, China’s rhetoric became more pro-Palestinian. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang accused Israel of going “beyond self-defense” in its military actions, putting China at odds with the US. While China has not taken a leadership role in the conflict, it has been critical of the US for blindly backing Israel and vetoing UN resolutions calling for a humanitarian pause and a ceasefire.
China’s role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has gained attention, but its engagement has been limited to statements and diplomatic efforts. The Chinese government has called for peace, condemned violence against civilians, and emphasized the Palestinian grievances. However, China’s influence in the conflict remains constrained, and its involvement in potential negotiations is uncertain. As this month’s Security Council president, China has made the Israel-Gaza war a priority and seeks to guide the council towards concrete actions in promoting political settlements.
China’s best-case scenario would be for the fighting to end swiftly and for China to play a role in the negotiating process. However, the extent of China’s involvement remains uncertain. While Western leaders have taken decisive actions, China’s cautious approach reflects its longstanding focus on the Palestinian cause and its economic interests in the region. As the conflict continues, China’s role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will be closely watched by the global community.
