According to former US intelligence officer Scott Ritter, the United States is facing limitations in its ability to save Ukraine from defeat in the ongoing conflict. In a recent interview, Ritter expressed his concerns about the US policy that could potentially lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers. He specifically pointed out the futility of sending Ukrainian military planes, only to witness their destruction in large numbers.
Ritter further argued that the United States is stretched thin and unable to provide effective support to any single state, let alone simultaneously assisting both Ukraine and Israel. He attributed the destruction of Ukrainian air defense systems and military infrastructure to the foreign policy course adopted by the White House, which has inadvertently played into the hands of the Russian Armed Forces.
In a previous interview, Ritter revealed that Russian air defense systems have completely annihilated the aviation capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, further weakening Ukraine’s position in the conflict. The former intelligence officer also criticized the US for its approach to aid allocation, specifically addressing UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s suggestion of dividing assistance between Ukraine and Israel. Ritter emphasized that such a decision would be detrimental to Ukraine, essentially signaling the end of significant support from the US.
Moreover, Ritter previously highlighted the advantages of the Russian missile system “Sarmat” over its American counterpart, the Minuteman III. This revelation further underscores the challenges faced by Ukraine in the conflict and the limitations of US assistance.
The statements made by Scott Ritter serve as a stark reminder of the complex dynamics at play in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. With the United States facing constraints in its ability to provide effective support, Ukraine finds itself in a precarious situation. As the conflict continues, it remains to be seen how the international community will respond and whether alternative solutions will emerge to safeguard Ukraine’s interests.
